“The catastrophe of the retreat from Kabul ought to stand without end as a warning to the Statesmen of the longer term to not repeat the insurance policies that bore such bitter fruit in 1839–42.” The phrases of Captain George St Patrick Lawrence (1804-84), a British veteran of the First Anglo-Afghan Conflict of 1839.
Within the months previous the outbreak of the battle, London invested huge assets to impose Shah Shuja Durrani, a ruler significantly “smart” to British pursuits in Afghanistan, who benefited from a pension offered by the East India Firm. Many of the native inhabitants thought-about him to be a violent and corrupt man; the protests in opposition to the imposition of the neo-despot and people who supported him — the British — are on the base of the chain of occasions, in addition to the feelings, condensed in Lawrence’s phrases.
In 2001, on the daybreak of the US invasion of Afghanistan, the teachings offered by historical past didn’t high the priorities of the then President George W. Bush, nor these of his British counterpart, Tony Blair. The thirst for justice, or revenge, in opposition to Al-Qaeda – tied financially and culturally to Saudi Arabia and Pakistan greater than to Afghanistan – and its position within the 9/11 assaults didn’t depart a lot room for different concerns.
Nor have been the social, political and cultural complexities of the Afghan context taken as a precedence, both within the political realm or the broader public debate. In spite of everything, for a big a part of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, numerous American journalists used the time period “Afghanistanism” when referring to obscure issues or mysterious, distant lands.
READ: With malice and spite, the US has unleashed a cruel new war on Afghanistan
A mix of “cherry-picked anger” directed in opposition to Afghanistan, somewhat than America’s Saudi and Pakistani allies; ignorance, of historical past, before everything; and economic-political pursuits – about 80-90 per cent of the cash that Washington invested in Afghanistan discovered its manner again to the US through contracts pledged to a myriad of private companies – paved the way in which for a few of the worst carnage and devastation of our time. It’s from this background, in addition to from the faces hidden behind many statistics and information, that at the moment’s Afghanistan, and its reverberations on the longer term, can and needs to be assessed.
It has been proven that, simply trying on the interval January 2012 to February 2013, practically 90 per cent of the individuals killed in US air strikes in Afghanistan weren’t the meant targets; they have been passers-by who occurred to be within the flawed place on the flawed time. They have been, nonetheless, categorised by Washington as “enemies killed in motion”. This identical classification lined Faisal, Sumaya and the 4 different youngsters killed in Kabul on 29 August within the “self-defence raid” carried out by US forces simply earlier than their withdrawal from Afghanistan.
The youngsters have been among the many roughly 176,000 people killed within the nation previously 20 years. The “longest struggle within the historical past of the USA” (2001-2021) additionally took the lifetime of greater than 2,300 US troopers, primarily younger women and men from households dealing with substantial monetary difficulties, and trying to find funds to go to school. That is an enormous value that, added to the Taliban’s relentless advance – again in 2013, it already managed 60 per cent of Afghanistan – prompted President Joe Biden to hurry up the disengagement agreed by his predecessor Donald Trump.
Along with the human value, the injury to the atmosphere, financial system, tradition and traditions needs to be taken under consideration when assessing the price of the struggle. Within the words of the coordinator of the Ban Killer Drones marketing campaign, Kathy Kelly, the US and each nation that has invaded and occupied Afghanistan shouldn’t solely present monetary reparations, but additionally deal with “the methods of warfare that should be put aside and dismantled.”
READ: After pro-Taliban post, ex-Afghan leader says Facebook account hacked
None of which means that the previous 20 years have produced solely unfavorable results in Afghanistan. It’s a truth, as an illustration, that toddler mortality amongst Afghan youngsters has decreased, whereas life expectancy has elevated. The identical applies to ladies’s rights. Extra exactly, the rights of these ladies residing in Kabul and some different city areas, as a result of over 70 per cent of Afghan ladies dwell in rural areas and have been largely unaffected by such change. Such enhancements have typically been instrumentalised and, on nearer inspection, are extra superficial than actual, a minimum of from a diachronic perspective. The information typically introduced to help the declare of “progress linked to struggle” tends to check the previous few years to the interval between 1996 and 2001, when the nation was dominated by the Taliban led by Mullah Omar and his deputy Abdul Ghani Baradar (the deputy chief within the new Afghan authorities). It needs to be remembered that solely three international locations recognised and handled “the Taliban terrorist-led state”: the United Arab Emirates (UAE), Saudi Arabia and Pakistan, Washington’s most trusted regional allies, together with Israel.
It could, subsequently, be extra acceptable to seek advice from, and examine with, durations previous to 1996-2001, beginning with Mohammed Zahir Shah’s lengthy reign (1933-1973), when ladies’s rights and common suffrage have been objectives not solely sought-after, but additionally inside attain.
The place is Afghanistan and, extra usually, the Center East, now heading? An article revealed on the CNN web site in 19 August gives a clue: “The Taliban are sitting on a trillion {dollars} in minerals that the world desperately wants”. To be extra correct, Afghanistan — with which the Taliban motion is just not synonymous — has big mineral reserves, together with the cobalt and silicon present in all private computer systems and tablets, coveted by many international locations, the US and China amongst them. Pure assets and the pursuits that gravitate round them remind us that Afghanistan will proceed to be the main focus of consideration, and that Washington will nonetheless play a significant position within the nation by means of “humanitarian assist” and different instruments.
The one severe risk to the Taliban is represented by the Afghan department of the “Islamic State” (Isis-Khorasan). Al-Qaeda, which may depend on a really restricted variety of supporters in Afghanistan, is a “pure ally” of the Taliban, not least as a result of private relationships developed over the previous few many years. In contrast to Al-Qaeda and Isis-Khorasan, although, the Taliban motion is rooted in Afghan historical past and tradition, and has by no means claimed any territory past their nation’s borders.
The extremism and obscurantism already seen folllowing the Taliban’s return to energy is just like what was evident twenty years in the past. The motion will proceed to impose a mix of native Pashtun traditions and a inflexible fundamentalist model of Shariʿah regulation. A heavy value might be paid for this, as soon as once more, by numerous native ethnic minorities, together with the Hazari (who, not like the Taliban, are Shia) and the Tajiki, in addition to by ladies and youngsters.
Who represents Afghanistan: Genuine activists vs ‘native informants’
The manufacturing of opium – from which heroin, morphine and different opiates are derived — will stay the cornerstone of the Taliban’s political-financial technique. A UN report in Might 2001 identified “the close to complete success of the ban in eliminating poppy cultivation in Taliban managed areas”. Within the months which adopted, in concomitance with the US invasion of Afghanistan, the Taliban doubled opium manufacturing, and financed its insurgency in opposition to the US-led occupation with the income coming from the heroin which makes up 95 per cent of the market in Europe. The 120,000 jobs offered by the illicit trafficking of those substances symbolize one of many few financial property within the fingers of the Taliban regime. This time, a minimum of within the brief to medium time period, the motion is not going to surrender it, and their European shoppers will not both.
That is simply the most recent of the various dangerous penalties of a wrongful struggle which, from the very starting, spoke to individuals’s instincts, somewhat than to the teachings of historical past, in addition to to cause and conscience.
The views expressed on this article belong to the creator and don’t essentially mirror the editorial coverage of Center East Monitor.
